Healthcare Management Co. specializes in high-value practice management software for therapists. HMC partnered with the Dialexa team to assist with enhancing the user experience of their flagship product, Therapy Space, which includes streamlined billing, scheduling, therapy notes, client portals, and top-notch training.
HMC planned to upgrade Therapy Space to a modern React front end with the best possible user experience to effectively convert more users from a free trial to a paid subscription. TherapySpace will be the platform to consolidate other HMC products.
The first target to tackle was the Global Navigation of TherapySpace. The new navigation must be highly responsive, intuitive, and easy to use. New designs needed to consider existing users and their ability to learn the refreshed experience. Additionally, the product experience needs to accommodate both sole practitioners and those operating within a group practice.
This engagement was split up into two main phases: research and design. It was a fast-paced project, so there was quite a bit of overlap and the team divided and conquered!
This dream team of amazing and talented women was a joy to work with! We really had the team divided, half focusing on the design activities and the other half focused on the research activities. Even though we were split in our specialties, we really all had our hands involved in all of the entire process! My main responsibilities were the competitive benchmark, information architecture, wireframes, and applied designs. However, I was still able to support the research activities of the interviews, archetypes, and usability testing.
As stated previously, this was quite the fast-paced engagement! We needed to uncover a lot of insights and set the client up in the right direction to update the experience of TherapySpace. We had 7 weeks to handoff, and I'm amazed by the progress we made in that short time!
Our first order of business was conducting stakeholder interviews. The goal for these interviews was to learn each stakeholder's expectations for the project, potential pitfalls, what success means to them, and any other important information they think we should know.
After learning about the product's current experience from demos and the stakeholders, we started to venture into user interviews. We were fortunate enough to have access to the current customer base and incentivized individuals with a chance to win a $100 gift card from Amazon. This led to the opportunity of conducting 8 full hour interviews with therapists and practice owners that currently utilize Therapy Space for their practice management needs.
In these interviews, we asked a variety of questions to fully understand how users utilize the Therapy Space product. We inquired about the overall product experience, but also had the opportunity to dive into specific features like the onboarding experience, organization and admin experience, reports, billing, and scheduling. Since we were mostly focused on the overall usability and global navigation of this project, we organized the information we received in what was in scope for this specific timeline, and what was out of scope but needs to be considered for future work. This information was synthesized in the affinity map shown below.
In order to gain quantitative research, we also asked customers to rate the overall ease of navigation, availability of key information, clarity of information, appearance, efficiency, and usability.
Device usage insights gathered from Pendo.
The team then summarized the user research and visualized these insights into three main archetypes to represent the audience clusters that utilize Therapy Space. It was important for us to keep the various users in mind, not just the therapists! Therefore, we landed on three archetypes: the Solo Practitioner, the Admin, and the Biller. Each archetype represents different roles, various points of entry into the product, and different practice sizes. We wanted to capture the overlap in user behaviors, attitudes, motivations, pain points, and goals. This goal led us to organize the user data in archetypes rather than personas to be more flexible and inclusive, rather than a specific human character.
A competitive analysis was crucial our the research process. We needed to understand the landscape of solutions to the foundation of the solution we were going to design. A competitive analysis provides strategic insights into the features, functions, flows, and feelings evoked by the design solutions of your competitors. By understanding these facets of competitors’ products, we were able to strategically design our solution with the goal of making a superior product and/or experience.
Therapy Space was measured against Simple Practice, Therapy Notes, Central Reach, Aloha, Rethink BH, and echoVantage EHR platforms to identify industry results. In parallel, participants from the user interviews were asked for information regarding the TheraNest platform and it’s Global Navigation to help us understand the performance impact, user’s pain points, and make better informed recommendations.
GLOBAL NAVIGATION
RESPONSIVENESS
FULL BENCHMARK
I used the tool Optimize Workshop to create a card sorting activity that we sent to the current customer base of Therapy Space. The goal of this online workshop was to discover the users' mental models and allow those insights to guide us into designing an information architecture that matches the users' expectations.
Open card sorting: Users were free to assign whatever names they want to groups they’ve created with the cards in that stack. This allowed us to strip from the way the system is now and see if other category names are more intuitive for the users.
Defining the cards: We utilized Pendo, the inVision prototype, and the current state of Therapy Space to identify all of the pages and actions a user might land on. We ended up with 120+. Because of the risk of drop off, it is best practice to present 40-80 cards. We accomplished this goal by consolidating those pages into 63 cards.
USER ROLES
We wanted to gain an understanding of how differently TheraNest users categorize items based on their roles: Biller, Scheduler, Therapist, Practice Owner, and Solo Practitioner.
TIME IN PRODUCT
Many stakeholders mentioned the concerns of users that have used Therapy Space for a long time. We want to balance finding the right solution to keep new customers, while not shocking and losing our loyal customers.
DEVICE USE
The goal is to create a responsive global navigation system. While there is a desire to create a mobile-first approach, we want to validate that need by assessing how many users operate TheraNest on their mobile devices.
PRACTICE USE
A user’s mental model might differ from another’s based on their practice size. We want to gain an understanding on what makes sense to small practices AND larger practices.
Billing = Finances: Majority of participants paired the billing reports like Write-Offs, Claims, and Payments with other financially related items like Insurers and Invoicing. Their mental models reflect that all financially related items should go together under one umbrella.
Dynamic Forms: 46 participants placed Dynamic Forms under Clients. Since this is where people typically add progress notes, it makes sense for the templates to belong in the same place. The second highest rating category for Dynamic Forms was Organization / Admin.
Staff Belongs in the Org: 52 participants placed Staff Members under Organization / Settings. We want the main level items to be relevant to most users, and this is not useful for the Sole Practitioner or other certain roles.
Reports Page is Too Large: At the time, the Reports was a page of only links. It was not scannable and the hierarchy was non-existent. Many participants placed certain reports in other areas of the system that make more sense to that category. For example, 47 users placed Login Audits in either Staff or Organization. Only 11 participants chose Reports.
Referrals: 36 participants put Referrers under the Organization/Practice umbrella. A few put it in a category of “Marketing”. This term might make more sense to the user, and also gives more room to grow that capability of a user tracking their business.
The card sorting activity enabled us with invaluable insights that led to a whole new information architecture. In this new IA, we were determined to design an experience that allows the users to focus on their tasks, not on finding their way around.
In order to develop and design an intuitive and efficient Information Architecture, we first have to understand how our users interact with the product. Our hierarchy must revolve around what the users need on a daily basis.
UNDERSTANDING THE USER
One of the biggest mistakes in IA design is not labeling things correctly. Users end up having to play a guessing game on where to find important information when the navigation and label items are unclear or not intuitive, wasting time and efficiency.
LABEL CONTENT CLEARLY
Product needs and competitors change and improve over time. It’s important to consider how your product might evolve in the future. Creating navigation that is scalable and can adapt with feature updates is essential.
FLEXIBILITY & ADAPTABILITY
Your pages should be clear, concise, and scannable. If there is too much information on a screen, it can be overwhelming and confusing for the user. When this is the case, the user might not know where to start and feel unguided and frustrated in the experience.
KEEP IT SIMPLE
Discoverability: We made an overall improvement in discoverability by placing similar items in proximity to each other. Users will no longer have to switch between multiple navigation umbrellas to look at different features and views of the same thing.
Findability: We received great insights from the Card Sorting and have now placed items to correspond with users’ mental models, making features and information easier to find.
Labeling: While this has to be validated from usability testing, we renamed some items to be more recognizeable and familiar to the user. This eliminates the need for users to click on pages only to see it was not what they were searching for.
Consolidation: We decreased the amount of pages by placing them as filter or toggle options. This organizes the structure of the platform better, while also eliminating option overload.
Once we landed on an initial pass for the new information architecture, it was time to start visualizing how this updated structure would look on screen. It's important to recall what the original state of the structure was. Therapy Space had both two stacked main horizontal menus and a left-side navigation menu. Then, as you got deeper into the application, you got a horizontal menu again. The hierarchy was non-existent and left users having to scan a lot of content to find what they needed.
Because this engagement focused on the global navigation, our wireframes and designs really focused on the menu and structure of the screens. Therefore, the actual content was minimal! We improved the complexity of the navigation by eliminating a level 4 menu altogether. We incorporated a multi-level action button that allows the user to intuitively add a note, appointment, document, etc. In the main navigation menu, we created dropdowns that house different pages within an overall category, creating the ability to focus on tasks without being distracted by too many options when navigating throughout the platform.
Therapy Space already has an established customer base, and we did not want to change things too much and shock the existing users. Therefore, we took the existing color palette as a base and changed it slightly to fit the desires of the new platform. We wanted the new platform to be a stress-free environment. Just as the therapists are a calming presence for their patients, Therapy Space is meant to be a calming presence for the providers. The moodboard below showed our vision for the future state of the platform, and the client loved it!
Below is the basic structure of a design system we implemented after landing on the look and feel of the new platform.
Home. In the current state of Therapy Space, there were two screens that served very similar functions: Tasks and Calendar. After researching how these functions are utilized by the user, we found it made the most sense to consolidate these screens into one task-oriented screen that would allow the user to manage their day, week, and month. We created high-level action items so the user can easily add an appointment or task on their home screen, as these are the most used functionalities. Because responsiveness was such an important ask, we made sure that action item would remain visible even on a smaller screen - just shifting to a multi-action fab button.
Clients. The next screens to focus on was the client management piece since this is so often where therapists and practitioners spend most of their time. There was also the most navigational improvement to be made in this section of the current platform! When a user would select clients, they would have to navigate to different screens depending on the type of client list they were looking for: prospective clients, client groups, my clients, all clients, etc. We minimized the extra steps and confusions with this flow by creating one client list screen where a user can filter by type in a dropdown rather than having to go to a different page entirely. Another improvement we implemented was when Ia user wanted to dive into an individual client, they would be able to see all of that client's information in one screen and could tab through the different categories of notes, cases, billing, history, etc. Once again , we eliminated the need for a user to navigate to a bunch of different screens and provided all the information they would need in one main user flow.